So, how powerful your computer is recording Should Be?
Well, this depends greatly on your needs. I started in 2001 with a Pentium 3 550MHz computer running Windows 98. (Compared to my modern computer is still quite modest), that the Flinstone from computer as a small bird was on a treadmill to power it.
What do you need?
The power of the computer requirementsfor your host computer is directly dependent on what you intend to do. Do you agree with the inclusion especially live rock bands? Do you plan to produce a solo artist to replace the sample with the entire band? How much of your work revolves around with VST instruments?
For more than four years ago I recorded with Sonic Foundry Vegas 3.0. I used it like a tape machine works better with a little editing. I did not have much reason to switch. I was especially the host rock and metalBands, all in the house. I was really happy with Vegas. I could do pretty much everything I wanted to do. It turned out that Vegas was very efficient and never really maxed my computer. Playing high track counts in Las Vegas put the main burden on the hard drive and not so much on the CPU or RAM. I had several mixes that are already over 60 titles. Vegas had no trouble with them.
I decided that I wanted to get back again into midi. I wanted the benefits of the powersof samples, VST instruments, and the mighty forces of the processing of MIDI sequencing. I switched to Cubase SX3. Now I realize how powerful Cubase SX3 is for a manufacturer (I'm not just engineering more), I am totally blown away. There is no way back to Las Vegas for me anymore. (Of course, I now hear that the latest version of Vegas has a sequencer, but I've never used them).
Cubase SX3 uses WAY more CPU power. WAY MORE! Every track I add, is a little more CPU power. Most of thesehas the tremendous opportunities that direct monitoring of Steinberg's Cubase SX3 uses do. It is very common for Cubase SX3 that their power and essentially locked up, if I do I expect too much from low latency with Cubase Set Super. Cranking the latency pulls the CPU usage dramatically, and then I find Cubase SX3 very reliable ..
Sonic Foundry Vegas RAM was extremely friendly. I could open up 5 finished mixes at the same time, and I would probably not even on 300 MBRAM. Cubase SX3 is the exact opposite. It uses RAM as I go through coffee on a late-night session. When you start the fire in rehearsals, how Toontrack DFH Superior (is amazing drum samples), it is clear that I need as much RAM as I can cram into my computer recording. An example of the drugstore, you can enter with the natural sounding drums on the planet, but it may be up to 2 GB of RAM, without thinking about it. OUCH! Fortunately, they have a "light" mode, which I use when tracking and. arrange If the track is finished, I can drum to WAV files, and they are much more computer friendly.
So if you with samples, you'd better have 2 GB of RAM. Not all applications will chew taxation as DFH Superior, but in general samples, such as through the RAM without conscience. So, if you produce songs for other people using n multitrack recorder / MIDI sequencers such as Cubase SX3 or Sonar, you should be the most powerful computer you can afford.It saves you time, effort and a few headaches. This means you get the fastest processor you can afford and the RAM is keep your host. (Note: There is a point of diminishing returns in Windows XP if the RAM does not seam to do much good. As a rule, 2 GB is considered about right by today's standards). You will also want to consider the dual-core processors that are out there now.
Powerful computers are not always better Recordings
There aremany factors that make a great host. A talented artist who is a tremendous achievement happens to deliver a great song, what a great host. There is no direct correlation between Ghz and goose bumps. (Am I getting goose bumps for the ultimate in musical performance. If I get goose bumps amazing, is the song!) With a powerful computer means that you have a mixdown to make a little bit faster. A faster computers means that more or impact, the higher useCPU load. However, just keep in mind that there is much more important to work with better artists and better songs.
The computer is only a tool. Just because a carpenter, a drill, which means operating at a higher voltage, not to be its construction is better than the other guy. It just means his drills are at a higher voltage. It is important to recognize that the computer is only a tool that you use, is to take pictures. Which in and of itself, has no direectartistic value.
I attended a funeral a few months ago. One of the first songs I recorded has ever happened in my life to be played. The power of the song was awesome! The entire crowd broke into tears, with that one. This song was on my Pentium 550MHz machine 3 years ago. I wish I could capture this kind of emotion and energy now with my Athlon 64 2800!
Latency, monitoring and CPU power.
I have noticed in Cubase that the CPU loadis directly related to the latency that I set in my M-Audio Control Panel in context. With latency to the fastest setting will receive Cubase SX3, fairly quickly tired. However, when I pump the latency up to 384ms, I find that I have much, much more CPU power left.
The only reason I would keep the super low latency rejected are that by the direct monitoring in Cubase. If I use an external mixer, and the recorded signal before it was even broken into my sound card, I would be able to keepthe latency is set much higher, and for that I reduce CPU load tremendously.
Conclusion
Most of the top home-recording programs with the strongest traits usually use the CPU power and RAM. When the recording methods require fewer features than a program like Sony Vegas will do very well with a moderate amount of CPU power.
Tags : Toshiba Mini NB205-N210 MSI U100-876US Toshiba Mini NB205-N310
